Siem Reap, Cambodia
April 25, 2008
What could enlightenment look like?
Pop culture would have us believe that enlightenment looked like the gaunt, hammy seriousness of Keanu Reeves in Little Buddha. But for the ancient Khmer, it was the face of Jayavarman VII, still revered in Cambodia as the greatest Khmer king.
From Angkor Wat, a short tuktuk ride took me to a walled city, Angkor Thom. Approaching the South Gate, we passed through two rows of stone heads flanking the entry causeway. This was how I first met The Faces, the silent sentries, mute witnesses to all the touristy goings-on. I stopped the tuktuk to behold them more closely.
I studied their features and expressions. They were identical: lips together but upturned as if smiling, flaring nostrils, and half-open eyes. They seemed to have been cast from the same mould. On one side of the causeway, The Faces were overlooking a moat of glassy water.
On the opposite was a dried-up moat that doubled as pasture for livestock. Again, The Faces seemed to scan the pastoral scene. Careening tuktuks and camwhoring tourists were an anachronism to the rustic serenity all around: still waters and languidly grazing cattle.
All this did not escape the gaze of a grimacing gopura, a gateway crowned by a human face. Of course it was The Face. I could not decide whether it was glowering at me or beckoning me. Passing under its chin, through what appeared to be a gaping hole on its throat, was like going through that Narnian wardrobe.
On the other side, I found myself in an imaginary world where I expected to see things I did not expect. The tuktuk zipped through the woods on bright terracotta ground. Quite suddenly, a clearing emerged, unveiling another temple-mountain: the Bayon. Cue in hand-over-mouth reaction.
Bayon was decidedly different from Angkor Wat stylistically – craggier but no less majestic. Its stone-gray jagged outline pierced the sky with impunity. There was more chaos than order in this microcosm of the universe. Acropolis-like ruins surrounded its base, roof-less columns standing on cracked slabs of rock. The whole temple appeared to be crumbling in suspended animation, as if it was a movie earthquake scene on pause.
I approached the temple tentatively, gingerly walking over sharp shards of broken rock. As I got closer, the peaks formed sharper images slowly revealing . . . The Faces. The crags and crevices from a distance were actually facial features etched on the stone towers. Four faces on each tower, corresponding to the four cardinal points, and as such, one could never lose their gaze. The eyes had their upper lids lowered as if squinting.
I walked and their gaze followed. This was Big Brother, Khmer style, but there were no hidden cameras, just The (ubiquitous) Faces. There were more than 200 of them – frozen faces that had seen passing centuries of mundane daily life, historic wars, religious conversions, human abandonment, and now stupefied tourists.
It was said that The Faces were patterned after King Jayavarman VII himself, whom I called the Bayonic Man. Rulers then projected their power to godlike status and would take on a deified image as their modern counterparts still did, apparently. Also, contrary to previous Khmer kings who were Hindu, the Bayonic Man was a Mahayana Buddhist. Thus, he chose the visage of the Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara as his representative image for the ages.
A Bodhisattva was a person who had attained a considerable measure of enlightenment and sought to help others achieve a similar spiritual state. Avalokiteshvara as the Bodhisattva for compassion could see the sufferings of all beings at all times, hence the downcast gaze and the omnipresent face.
Some Angkorian experts believed that the Bayonic Man lived up to his Bodhisattva and was a compassionate and accessible king to his people. Perhaps that was why he was hailed as the greatest Khmer king, not only for having an edifice complex, i.e. building dozens of monuments during his reign. However, his successors converted back to Hinduism and they summarily decapitated his Buddha images.
Stone chambers and steep stony steps allowed tourists to clamber up the temple-mountain. Bas-relief depicting daily Angkorian life was in stark contrast to the mythology on the walls of Angkor Wat. Countless devata images stood on guard at every turn, lending a feminine touch on the masculine rock-hard face towers.
I chanced on a local artist on a corner lost in his sketches as his devata-muse watched over him. And also on this day, at the summit of the temple-mountain, I came face-to-face with The Face.
It was rather disconcerting gazing at The Face that gazed back. It could be creepy in broad daylight; it would have sown terror at night or sundown. But that Angkorian smile eventually softened The Face. It was a knowing smile, one that conveyed the discovery of a profound secret. It beckoned, it calmed, it lingered in the memory.
Descending from Bayon, I looked at The Faces in a different light. It was as if the Bayonic Man they represented was serenely sleeping with a smile on his face. I smiled back knowing that this was what enlightenment looked like.
Thanks for reading! If you like my content, you may…
you should be a writer for national geographic, this is some classic stuff. haha
National geographic my arse, Jays! But thanks for spreadin’ some luv. Not everyone digs my florid writing style. :p
you are a great writer, succint yet vivid. Do you currently earn anything for your writing? You should!
You can’t imagine how much you’ve made my day, Gin! 🙂 But the answer is no. I find it difficult to write about things beyond the realm of my experience.
Cambodia heritage is much richer than ours. The people lives very modestly. This temple is a powerful symbol and lure tourists like you. I believe this iconic place is a Unesco World Heritage but not sure. I can’t think of any manmade structure except the Banawe rice terraces that we can be proud of in our country!
The entire Angkor Archeological Park is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. And rightly so. It’s a miracle that the temples are still extant despite centuries of abandonment and looting. You should visit it. Angkor deserves to be in anyone’s bucket list.
Our beautifully baroque cathedrals are man-made structures that we can be proud of. Churches in Paoay and Miag-ao come to mind. Although the design and technology used were imported, they were still built by our people. But if you’re looking for authentically Pinoy work of wonder, you’re right – the Banawe Rice Terraces it is. And the hanging coffins in Sagada.
Ancient Filipinos didn’t build majestic structures like Angkor but it doesn’t mean our pre-Spanish culture wasn’t sophisticated. We were more akin to Polynesians than mainland Asians, I guess. We already had the balangay, the wooden watercraft that traversed the rough seas and the Pacific. That’s no mean feat, right? 🙂
nice……
This is a very interesting site, I will book mark it and come back later.
Johnny Ray
Thanks Johnny Ray. And back at ya!
Wow,great site,beautiful places and photo…I very hope tat can go travel around the world just like you…
Thanks Ken! Drop in again. 🙂
I actually like your blog and I will visit it often. Keep up the good work!
The feeling is mutual. 🙂 Thanks Ricky. Be well.
This is an interesting website, congratulations, so, could you help me to spread my blog? Now I’m following you, just click on the title of English Tips thanks for your help advanced, if interested, let’s share our link on blog’s roll, link my blog please
No prob, Pedro. Consider it done!
Some great photos here and its an interesting read as well.
Thanks Kevin! Checked out your site too. Very informative and insightful! Now I know the differences between Theravada and Mahayana.
My favorite pic is Face to Face. Well that one, and Buddha Comes to a Head, of course.
Thanks Mr. Cheese! 🙂
You’re the Bionic Man AJ??? Cool!
I love all the pictures and the write up as always… You’re the best! Cheers!
Bionic is too much of a stretch. Just Bayonic. 😀 Thanks Jorie.
The likeness is incredible. Thanks for the article too.
Cheers A
I’m not worthy, A. I’m not a bodhisattva…yet! 🙂
Brilliant descriptions, almost story like and some fantastic photo’s to boot. I hadn’t noticed before until you mention it – are they smiling or warning? I like to think smiling and welcoming.
Same here, I’d say they’re smiling. More like savoring the moment cuz their eyes are almost shut. I do that when I’m having my favorite ice cream. 😀 But from afar, you don’t see the eyes clearly so they look rather sinister.
As usual, your comment made me blush. 🙂
Every time I see the architecture, I think of the temples here in South India. The word ‘gopura’ is the word ‘gopuram’ in Tamil. And the names, they sound so Tamil – Jayavarman. I tried reading up but looks like there is no connection between the kings and South India. But the word ‘gopura’ is definitely Dravidian, I think.
The faces are truly magnificient to behold. I often wonder how those kings would have built those huge structures and gave those faces the expressions. How they would have withstood the ages?
I like the word “tuktuk.” Onomatapoeic, I reckon. Does it sound the same while it is in motion?
Enjoyed this piece.
Joy always,
Susan
Hi Sus! (sounds like Zeus, haha) The basis of your observations had been laid down many centuries ago. The Indianization of SEA (Southeast Asia) started well before the birth of Christ. It was spurred by both commerce and oceanic currents.
India traded with China then (till now, I suppose) and, to reach China, Indian merchants had to go through Indochina. At times they had to wait for the Indian Ocean currents to go their way for easier navigation. So they lingered in present-day Indonesia, Cambodia, Myanmar, and Malaysia, spreading their culture – language, religion, mythologies, and art. The Indian-style city states that developed from that influence include the ruins of Angkor Wat. Hinduism and Buddhism remain to be the religions of many people in these countries.
As for the word “tuktuk”, it does seem onomatopoeic. Didn’t sound that way when I rode on them though. But you got me curious there. I’d listen more closely next time. 🙂
Glad you enjoyed the article. Cheerio!
Nicely done. I Loved the story and pictures. The expressions on their faces are breathtaking. Someday, I will travel there and it will seem familiar because of you. Thank you!
That’d be more than 200 familiar faces then. 🙂 Thanks for the visit, Skin Chick!
Your writing! I agree with JC up there – you should definitely be a writer for national geographic. As if people wouldn’t enjoy reading this! It’s very well written, vivid and personal yet still holding a degree of relatability. Good stuff!!
This is the influence of years of watching NatGeo channel! It’s my favorite along with Discovery and the History Channel. Go figure. 🙂 Thanks Cindy. I’ll be exploring your site more soon. I’m traveling now, doing field work for future blog entries. Haha!
galing! i love it!
Galeng mo rin Ian. Na-unearth mo pa ito sa baul! Tagal na to eh. 🙂
Your article contains lots of informations , this looks like an National Geografic decumentary … Congrats !